Volume 34, Issue 1 p. e67-e72
Original Article

Transfusion with 2 litres of hyperimmune plasma is superior to transfusion of 1 litre for protecting foals against pneumonia attributed to Rhodococcus equi

P. Flores-Ahlschwede

P. Flores-Ahlschwede

Rood & Riddle Equine Hospital in Saratoga, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
S. K. Kahn

S. K. Kahn

Equine Infectious Disease Laboratory, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
S. Ahlschwede

S. Ahlschwede

Rood & Riddle Equine Hospital in Saratoga, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
A. I. Bordin

A. I. Bordin

Equine Infectious Disease Laboratory, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
N. D. Cohen

Corresponding Author

N. D. Cohen

Equine Infectious Disease Laboratory, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA

*Corresponding author email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 January 2021

Summary

Background

Transfusion of plasma hyperimmune against Rhodococcus equi (REHIP) is used to reduce the incidence of foal pneumonia caused by R. equi on endemic farms, but the optimal volume to transfuse is unknown.

Objectives

To determine whether transfusion of 2 L of REHIP to foals was superior to transfusion of 1 L for reducing the incidence of pneumonia attributed to R. equi in foals.

Study design

Retrospective cohort design.

Methods

Medical records of 158 foals from two breeding farms in Saratoga Springs, New York, were reviewed. Information collected from mares and foals included the date of birth, volume of REHIP transfused to foals, and whether the foal developed pneumonia attributed to R. equi. Data were analysed using random-effects logistic regression with pneumonia as the outcome variable and farm modelled as a random effect to account for clustering of foals within farm.

Results

There were 77 foals with evidence of clinical (n = 75) or subclinical (n = 2) pneumonia. The odds of pneumonia were 2.5-fold greater (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–5.8; P = 0.0319) for foals transfused with 1 L than for foals transfused with 2 L. The odds of pneumonia were 2.7-fold (95% CI, 1.4–5.5; P = 0.0046) greater for foals born in April or May than for foals born before April. Accounting for the effects of birth month, the odds of pneumonia were 2.4-fold (95% CI, 1.1–5.6; P = 0.0457) higher for foals transfused with 1 L of REHIP than for foals transfused with 2 L.

Main limitations

The major limitations of this study are the observational study design and that diagnosis of R. equi pneumonia was presumptive.

Conclusions

Transfusing foals with 2 L of REHIP is probably superior to transfusing 1 L for reducing the incidence of R. equi pneumonia and appeared safe.